{"id":85537,"date":"2023-07-17T10:55:41","date_gmt":"2023-07-17T14:55:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/?post_type=ftm_article&p=85537"},"modified":"2023-07-24T18:31:10","modified_gmt":"2023-07-24T22:31:10","slug":"neuroscience-speed-reading","status":"publish","type":"ftm_article","link":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/culture\/neuroscience-speed-reading","title":{"rendered":"Neuroscience shows that speed reading is bullshit"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Forty years ago, Donald Homa<\/a>, a professor of psychology at Arizona State University specializing in memory and the visual perception of linguistic stimuli, was contacted<\/a>by officials at the American Speed Reading Academy with an extraordinary tale. Two of their pupils had achieved a reading rate in excess of 100,000 words per minute, more than ten times the speed of their average students and more than 300 times what college-educated adults can muster (between 200 and 400 words per minute). Would he be willing to assess their prodigious skills in a laboratory setting?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Curious, Homa happily obliged. In the lab, he tasked the two men with speed reading an entire college level textbook then taking a multiple-choice test to gauge their comprehension. After finishing the text in mere minutes, they took the test and absolutely bombed. They didn\u2019t seem to have learned much of anything.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe only noteworthy skill exhibited by the two speed readers was a remarkable dexterity in page-turning,\u201d Homa concluded.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While this episode is admittedly anecdotal, it does exemplify what scientists have broadly learned about speed reading: It doesn\u2019t work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Two major reasons speed reading doesn\u2019t work<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

For well over a half-century, speed reading courses all promise to drastically accelerate one\u2019s reading ability with no detriment to comprehension. Proponents claim people can become speed readers by learning to take in more words with less eye movement and by silencing their inner speech that accompanies reading.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Summarizing decades of research in an article<\/a> published in 2016, an all-star team of cognitive scientists and linguists specializing in reading ability and visual perception debunked both of these speed reading tenets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

First, how human vision works, including the very structure of the eye, simply doesn\u2019t allow us to see words on the periphery of our visual field with enough clarity to fully take in their meaning. Thus, the notion that whole blocks of words can be understood at a glance is nonsensical. Moreover, experiments have repeatedly shown that speed readers\u2019 peripheral vision is no better than normal readers\u2019. It can\u2019t be trained.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Second, silencing one\u2019s inner reading voice<\/a> can permit one to intake text more quickly, but it seems to come at the expense of comprehension. Sounds are key to language, so translating visual information into phonological (sound) form, even just in one\u2019s head, is necessary for complete understanding of written words.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Reading, fast and slow<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Still, those behind speed reading programs point to data showing that their students\u2019 reading speed improves while maintaining comprehension<\/a>. Pupils are given a pre-test and a post-test and generally experience sizable improvement. The authors of the 2016 report countered that these are generally bogus.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cSometimes the pre-test is harder than the post-test, and other times trainees are tested repeatedly on the same material. In both cases, it is inevitable that their performance will be better on the post-test merely because of the relative difficulty of the tests or because of repeated exposure.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When scientists have rigorously scrutinized speed reading courses, they have repeatedly found that students do indeed boost their reading rate, measured in words per minute, but this acceleration comes at the expense of comprehension. The faster people read, the less they remember<\/a> what they have read.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nowadays, there are apps that purportedly make speed reading easy. Most of these present a text\u2019s words one at a time in the same spot, allowing the user to adjust the presentation speed. This method, termed rapid serial visual presentation, permits the reader\u2019s gaze to remain fixed \u2014 eliminating the supposedly wasteful need to scan from word to word. Alas, these apps don\u2019t work either<\/a>. As users adjust the text presentation speed up, their comprehension falls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Take a look, it\u2019s in a book<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

So if speed reading is bogus, is there any way to read<\/a> more quickly? Yes, the authors of the blockbuster 2016 report say. The answer is to read more, in conjunction with expanding one\u2019s vocabulary. Such practice is admittedly time-consuming, but like so many other skills that require hours and hours of repetition to perfect, reading ability must be honed through effort. Like a pianist playing every day for years, a basketball player taking endless shots, or a pilot spending thousands of hours in the air, expertise takes time. It cannot be taught via a 12-week training program.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This article was reprinted with permission of Big Think<\/a>, where it was originally published<\/a><\/em>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Speed reading programs claim to teach students how to read more quickly without reducing comprehension. Research shows that they don’t work.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":52,"featured_media":86214,"template":"","ftm_taxonomy_fields":[60,110],"ftm_taxonomy_challenges":[],"ftm_taxonomy_statuses":[],"ftm_taxonomy_hidden_tags":[],"class_list":["post-85537","ftm_article","type-ftm_article","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","ftm_taxonomy_fields-books","ftm_taxonomy_fields-neuroscience"],"acf":[],"apple_news_notices":[],"yoast_head":"\nNeuroscience shows that speed reading is bullshit<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Speed reading programs claim to teach students how to read more quickly without reducing comprehension. Research shows that they don't work.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/bigthink.com\/smart-skills\/neuroscience-speed-reading-bullshit\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Neuroscience shows that speed reading is bullshit\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Speed reading programs claim to teach students how to read more quickly without reducing comprehension. Research shows that they don't work.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/bigthink.com\/smart-skills\/neuroscience-speed-reading-bullshit\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Freethink\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-07-24T22:31:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/reading.jpg?resize=1200,630\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"630\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"Despite the claims of speed reading apps, it turns out that you actually have to read the book if you want to learn from it.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Neuroscience shows that speed reading is bullshit","description":"Speed reading programs claim to teach students how to read more quickly without reducing comprehension. Research shows that they don't work.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/bigthink.com\/smart-skills\/neuroscience-speed-reading-bullshit\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Neuroscience shows that speed reading is bullshit","og_description":"Speed reading programs claim to teach students how to read more quickly without reducing comprehension. Research shows that they don't work.","og_url":"https:\/\/bigthink.com\/smart-skills\/neuroscience-speed-reading-bullshit\/","og_site_name":"Freethink","article_modified_time":"2023-07-24T22:31:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":630,"url":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/reading.jpg?resize=1200,630","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_description":"Despite the claims of speed reading apps, it turns out that you actually have to read the book if you want to learn from it.","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/bigthink.com\/smart-skills\/neuroscience-speed-reading-bullshit\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/culture\/neuroscience-speed-reading"},"author":{"name":"hannahsadieweber","@id":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/#\/schema\/person\/683fbd27f9d24648c48dc7a6ab23f311"},"headline":"Neuroscience shows that speed reading is bullshit","datePublished":"2023-07-17T14:55:41+00:00","dateModified":"2023-07-24T22:31:10+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/culture\/neuroscience-speed-reading"},"wordCount":753,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/bigthink.com\/smart-skills\/neuroscience-speed-reading-bullshit\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/reading.jpg?quality=75","inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/culture\/neuroscience-speed-reading","url":"https:\/\/bigthink.com\/smart-skills\/neuroscience-speed-reading-bullshit\/","name":"Neuroscience shows that speed reading is bullshit","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/bigthink.com\/smart-skills\/neuroscience-speed-reading-bullshit\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/bigthink.com\/smart-skills\/neuroscience-speed-reading-bullshit\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/reading.jpg?quality=75","datePublished":"2023-07-17T14:55:41+00:00","dateModified":"2023-07-24T22:31:10+00:00","description":"Speed reading programs claim to teach students how to read more quickly without reducing comprehension. Research shows that they don't work.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/bigthink.com\/smart-skills\/neuroscience-speed-reading-bullshit\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/bigthink.com\/smart-skills\/neuroscience-speed-reading-bullshit\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/bigthink.com\/smart-skills\/neuroscience-speed-reading-bullshit\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/reading.jpg?quality=75","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/reading.jpg?quality=75","width":1200,"height":675,"caption":"Unsplash+ \/ Getty Images"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/bigthink.com\/smart-skills\/neuroscience-speed-reading-bullshit\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Articles","item":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/articles"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Neuroscience shows that speed reading is bullshit"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/","name":"Freethink","description":"Move the world","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/#organization","name":"Freethink Media","url":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/logo.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/logo.svg","width":651,"height":124,"caption":"Freethink Media"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/#\/schema\/person\/683fbd27f9d24648c48dc7a6ab23f311","name":"hannahsadieweber","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ff5f49f193e5d8fb02ce83b0e28e44857f98b97911e353ac8dc7ce97de5ca019?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ff5f49f193e5d8fb02ce83b0e28e44857f98b97911e353ac8dc7ce97de5ca019?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"hannahsadieweber"},"url":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/author\/hannahsadieweber"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ftm_article\/85537","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ftm_article"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/ftm_article"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/52"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/86214"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=85537"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"ftm_taxonomy_fields","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ftm_taxonomy_fields?post=85537"},{"taxonomy":"ftm_taxonomy_challenges","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ftm_taxonomy_challenges?post=85537"},{"taxonomy":"ftm_taxonomy_statuses","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ftm_taxonomy_statuses?post=85537"},{"taxonomy":"ftm_taxonomy_hidden_tags","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ftm_taxonomy_hidden_tags?post=85537"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}