{"id":112679,"date":"2024-11-19T12:00:00","date_gmt":"2024-11-19T17:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/?post_type=ftm_article&p=112679"},"modified":"2024-12-10T13:06:53","modified_gmt":"2024-12-10T18:06:53","slug":"internet-archive-fair-use","status":"publish","type":"ftm_article","link":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/internet\/internet-archive-fair-use","title":{"rendered":"How the Internet Archive’s \u201cFree Digital Library\u201d fell to the \u201cfair use\u201d test"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

It was an idea that probably never stood a chance in the long run. Since 2005, the Internet Archive, a nonprofit entity devoted to providing \u201cuniversal access to all knowledge,\u201d has been digitizing physical books and posting copies to its website, where users may read them for free. In 2018, the Internet Archive began partnering with various libraries around the country to offer online access to their respective physical holdings as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cNot everyone has access to a public or academic library with a good collection,\u201d the Internet Archive argued, \u201cso to provide universal access we need to provide digital versions of books.\u201d Such thinking led to the creation of the Internet Archive\u2019s \u201cFree Digital Library\u201d and \u201cOpen Library Project,\u201d in which \u201cone reader at a time can read a digitized copy of a legally owned library book.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sounds like a safe and noncontroversial idea, right? Not exactly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In September 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit found the Internet Archive to be in violation of federal law over its \u201clarge scale copying and distribution of copyrighted books without permission from or payment to the Publishers or authors.\u201d To allow such behavior to continue, the 2nd Circuit declared in Hachette Book Group v. Internet Archive<\/em><\/a>, \u201cwould allow for widescale copying that deprives creators of compensation and diminishes the incentive to produce new works.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Copyright law is a jagged rock on which many seemingly promising ideas have been wrecked. In this particular case, the perilous legal provision turned out to be Section 107<\/a> of the Copyright Act, which governs \u201cthe fair use of a copyrighted work.\u201d According to that provision, a copyrighted work may be fairly used without permission from the copyright holder \u201cfor purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to the Internet Archive, that language should be read to fully protect both the collecting and lending practices of its free digital library. \u201cThe record is replete,\u201d the group pointed out<\/a>, \u201cwith examples of IA facilitating access to books needed for classroom use and academic research that would not have been possible otherwise.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That the Internet Archive has been a great boon to students, teachers, and scholars is undoubtedly true. Indeed, I can personally testify to the fact. When I was researching my recent book<\/a> about Frederick Douglass and the Constitution, I was grateful for the many dusty old volumes that the Internet Archive effectively placed at my fingertips. Innumerable other writers and researchers would surely say something similar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But the problem for the Internet Archive is that Section 107 also states that certain other factors must be considered \u201cin determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use.\u201d And one of those factors is \u201cthe effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.\u201d In other words, fair use does not include undercutting the commercial viability of the copyrighted work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That is where the Internet Archive\u2019s legal troubles really originated. In 2020, a coalition of four book publishing giants\u2014Hachette Book Group, Harper Collins Publishers, John Wiley & Sons, and Penguin Random House\u2014filed suit<\/a>, alleging that the Internet Archive\u2019s \u201cunauthorized copying and distribution of Plaintiffs\u2019 works include titles that the Publishers are currently selling commercially and currently providing to libraries in ebook form, making Defendant\u2019s business a direct substitute for established markets.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Unlike traditional public libraries, which \u201cbuy print books and license ebooks (or agree to terms of sale for ebooks) from publishers,\u201d the four publishers stated in their lawsuit, the Internet Archive commits \u201cwillful mass copyright infringement\u201d and then distributes \u201cdigital bootleg versions online.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Unfortunately for the Internet Archive, the 2nd Circuit basically shared that negative assessment of the situation. \u201cIs it \u2018fair use\u2019 for a nonprofit organization to scan copyright-protected print books in their entirety and distribute those digital copies online, in full, for free, subject to a one-to-one owned-to-loaned ratio between its print copies and the digital copies it makes available at any given time, all without authorization from the copyright-holding publishers or author,\u201d asked the 2nd Circuit. \u201cWe conclude the answer is no.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the 2nd Circuit\u2019s view, the Internet Archive \u201cdoes not perform the traditional functions of a library.\u201d Instead, it \u201cprepares derivatives of Publishers\u2019 Works and delivers those derivatives to its users in full.\u201d In other words, the court said, the Internet Archive offers illegal free versions of what publishers and authors alone have the exclusive legal right to sell or otherwise distribute.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Furthermore, the appellate court declared, \u201cwere we to approve IA\u2019s use of the Works, there would be little reason for consumers or libraries to pay Publishers for content they could access for free on IA\u2019s website.\u201d All of which made it \u201cself-evident\u201d to the 2nd Circuit, \u201cthat if IA\u2019s use were to become widespread, it would adversely affect Publishers\u2019 markets for the Works.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was for these reasons that the Internet Archive failed the fair use test, as interpreted by the 2nd Circuit. Of course, the Internet Archive is likely to appeal its loss, but that is no guarantee of a better outcome. In fact, given the thoroughness of the 2nd Circuit\u2019s judgment, combined with the unforgiving language of the Copyright Act, the Supreme Court might not even bother to hear an appeal in this matter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That outcome may be good news for publishers who want to sell more ebooks. But is it good news for authors and readers in general? <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The writer Virginia Postrel, who specializes in the intersection of culture and technology, once observed<\/a> that the rise of the web has taken us from \u201ca world in which reading material was relatively scarce and expensive to one in which it\u2019s overabundant and nearly free.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

For many authors, that has made it much more difficult to even get their books noticed in the first place. Furthermore, Postrel noted, \u201cfor increasing numbers of readers, a book that doesn\u2019t show up in a Google search or can\u2019t be linked to in some way online might as well not exist.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Internet Archive has stood as a sort of bulwark against that particular trend. Its free digital library grabbed hold of such titles and helped to ensure that future readers might someday discover them online. As a result of the judgment in this case, however, that bulwark has been weakened, if not fatally undermined.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe knowledge embodied in books deserves preservation, not destruction, and particularly not destruction at the behest of authors and publishers,\u201d Postrel told me about the 2nd Circuit\u2019s decision. \u201cThe ruling could hardly be worse. Forcing the Internet Archive to destroy digital copies\u2014to burn digital books\u2014goes far beyond protecting authors\u2019 rights to profit from their copyrighted work. By destroying the ability to search those books, it potentially depresses sales. When you discover that a book discusses a topic you\u2019re interested in you’re more likely to buy it.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And yet, Postrel added, \u201cif I\u2019d been on the Internet Archive\u2019s board, however, I would have argued against the Free Digital Library.\u201d Why? \u201cNot because the archive\u2019s case was wrong,\u201d she says, \u201cbut because its definition of fair use was aggressive and extremely risky for the institution.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The damage arising from that risk has certainly been done now. Whether the Internet Archive ever fully recovers from the legal loss remains to be seen.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit has found the Internet Archive to be in violation of federal law. Here’s why.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":15,"featured_media":113018,"template":"","ftm_taxonomy_fields":[42,54,60,79],"ftm_taxonomy_challenges":[],"ftm_taxonomy_statuses":[36],"ftm_taxonomy_hidden_tags":[],"class_list":["post-112679","ftm_article","type-ftm_article","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","ftm_taxonomy_fields-activism","ftm_taxonomy_fields-authors","ftm_taxonomy_fields-books","ftm_taxonomy_fields-economics","ftm_taxonomy_statuses-featured"],"acf":[],"apple_news_notices":[],"yoast_head":"\nHow the Internet Archive's \u201cFree Digital Library\u201d fell to the \u201cfair use\u201d test<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit has found the Internet Archive to be in violation of federal law. Here's why.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/internet\/internet-archive-fair-use\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"How the Internet Archive's \u201cFree Digital Library\u201d fell to the \u201cfair use\u201d test\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit has found the Internet Archive to be in violation of federal law. Here's why.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/internet\/internet-archive-fair-use\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Freethink\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-12-10T18:06:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/internet-archive-thumb-1.png?resize=1200,630\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"630\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"The nonprofit made a bold gamble on the limits of "fair use" -- and federal courts have not backed their play.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"How the Internet Archive's \u201cFree Digital Library\u201d fell to the \u201cfair use\u201d test","description":"The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit has found the Internet Archive to be in violation of federal law. Here's why.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/internet\/internet-archive-fair-use","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"How the Internet Archive's \u201cFree Digital Library\u201d fell to the \u201cfair use\u201d test","og_description":"The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit has found the Internet Archive to be in violation of federal law. Here's why.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/internet\/internet-archive-fair-use","og_site_name":"Freethink","article_modified_time":"2024-12-10T18:06:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":630,"url":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/internet-archive-thumb-1.png?resize=1200,630","type":"image\/png"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_description":"The nonprofit made a bold gamble on the limits of \"fair use\" -- and federal courts have not backed their play.","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/internet\/internet-archive-fair-use#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/internet\/internet-archive-fair-use"},"author":{"name":"seanmcvey","@id":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/#\/schema\/person\/2594c0a1e33b976be410d052fbb119a8"},"headline":"How the Internet Archive’s \u201cFree Digital Library\u201d fell to the \u201cfair use\u201d test","datePublished":"2024-11-19T17:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2024-12-10T18:06:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/internet\/internet-archive-fair-use"},"wordCount":1261,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/internet\/internet-archive-fair-use#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/internet-archive-thumb-1.png?quality=75","inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/internet\/internet-archive-fair-use","url":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/internet\/internet-archive-fair-use","name":"How the Internet Archive's \u201cFree Digital Library\u201d fell to the \u201cfair use\u201d test","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/internet\/internet-archive-fair-use#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/internet\/internet-archive-fair-use#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/internet-archive-thumb-1.png?quality=75","datePublished":"2024-11-19T17:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2024-12-10T18:06:53+00:00","description":"The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit has found the Internet Archive to be in violation of federal law. Here's why.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/internet\/internet-archive-fair-use#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/internet\/internet-archive-fair-use"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/internet\/internet-archive-fair-use#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/internet-archive-thumb-1.png?quality=75","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/internet-archive-thumb-1.png?quality=75","width":1600,"height":900,"caption":"joostverbeek \/ Adobe Stock"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/internet\/internet-archive-fair-use#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Articles","item":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/articles"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"How the Internet Archive’s \u201cFree Digital Library\u201d fell to the \u201cfair use\u201d test"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/","name":"Freethink","description":"Move the world","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/#organization","name":"Freethink Media","url":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/logo.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/logo.svg","width":651,"height":124,"caption":"Freethink Media"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/#\/schema\/person\/2594c0a1e33b976be410d052fbb119a8","name":"seanmcvey","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e09ce4b5260e3326c6777e5450bbcef3c88c3e21af81b4d0f21100a088d54d23?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e09ce4b5260e3326c6777e5450bbcef3c88c3e21af81b4d0f21100a088d54d23?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"seanmcvey"},"url":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/author\/seanmcvey"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ftm_article\/112679","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ftm_article"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/ftm_article"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/15"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/113018"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=112679"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"ftm_taxonomy_fields","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ftm_taxonomy_fields?post=112679"},{"taxonomy":"ftm_taxonomy_challenges","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ftm_taxonomy_challenges?post=112679"},{"taxonomy":"ftm_taxonomy_statuses","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ftm_taxonomy_statuses?post=112679"},{"taxonomy":"ftm_taxonomy_hidden_tags","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.freethink.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ftm_taxonomy_hidden_tags?post=112679"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}